Ann Geriatr Med Res Search

CLOSE


Ann Geriatr Med Res > Epub ahead of print
Miura, Kuroki, and Shimizu: Association between Participation in a Municipality-led Walking Program and Readiness for Lifestyle Improvement among Community-Dwelling Older Adults: A Retrospective Comparative Study Using Linked Administrative Data

Abstract

Background

Promoting physical activity among older adults is essential for extending healthy life expectancy. Municipality-led walking programs have been introduced in Japan; however, evidence of their effectiveness in promoting readiness for lifestyle improvement among older adults remains limited. We examined the association between participation in a municipality-led walking promotion program and readiness for lifestyle improvement among community-dwelling older adults.

Methods

Data of community-dwelling adults aged ≥65 years who participated in a municipality-led walking promotion program implemented in Zushi City, Japan, in 2021, were compared with those of non-participants selected from the National Health Insurance database. Behavioral readiness was evaluated using the five-stage classification of the transtheoretical model. Pre- and post-intervention stages were assessed in both groups. Associations between participation and behavioral stage were examined using ordinal logistic regression with unadjusted, basic-adjusted, and fully adjusted models, controlling for baseline stage and habitual exercise.

Results

Participants in the walking event had higher odds of being at a higher readiness stage than non-participants (unadjusted odds ratio [OR]=2.91; basic-adjusted OR=2.99; fully adjusted OR=2.98). Analyses using a dichotomized transtheoretical model variable also indicated consistently higher odds of being in the action or maintenance stages among participants.

Conclusion

Our findings suggest that short-term, municipality-led walking initiatives contribute to early-stage behavioral readiness for lifestyle improvement in older adults. They provide a valuable foundation for planning community-based health promotion and long-term care prevention strategies. Further studies are needed to evaluate similar programs across different settings and over more extended periods.

INTRODUCTION

Globally, aging is one of the most significant healthcare and social challenges of the 21st century.1) The number of people aged ≥60 years is projected to increase from one billion in 2020 to over two billion by 2050.1) The population of those aged ≥80 years is expected to triple, reaching 426 million by 2050. Japan is experiencing the most rapid demographic aging, with approximately 16% of the total population projected to be aged ≥80 years by 2050.2) This demographic shift is associated with elevated risks of chronic diseases, frailty, and care dependency, resulting in increased healthcare and long-term care costs.3) Therefore, extending healthy life expectancy and preventing functional decline among older adults are critical public health priorities.4)
Regular physical activity is a key determinant of health and independence among older adults.5) Physical activity contributes to the prevention of noncommunicable diseases, helps prevent frailty, reduces fall risk, and mitigates age-related functional decline.6) International guidelines recommend that older adults should engage in at least 150 minutes of moderate-intensity aerobic exercise per week along with muscle-strengthening activities 2 or more days per week.5,7)
Walking is particularly suitable for older adults due to its relatively low physical burden, ease of implementation, and minimal resource requirements.8,9) The widespread use of pedometers, smartphones, and wearable devices has enabled the objective and straightforward monitoring of daily step counts, making walking a practical and measurable form of physical activity for community health promotion.10)
Recent studies have demonstrated that even modest increases in daily step count are associated with significant reductions in mortality and healthcare costs.11-13) A previous study reported that every 1,000-step increase in daily steps was associated with a reduced risk of all-cause mortality, cardiovascular disease, and diabetes.14) Meta-analyses have indicated that walking approximately 6,000–8,000 steps/day is associated with a lower mortality risk among older adults.15) A United States (US)-based cohort study showed that walking ≥8,000 steps on 1–2 days per week can contribute to a reduced long-term mortality risk.16) In Japan, analyses of municipal-level data have suggested that increasing daily step counts is associated with lower healthcare expenditures, with estimated cost reductions of approximately 16 yen/day in the short term and 28 yen/day in the long term per additional step.17) Accordingly, practical targets have been promoted as attainable goals for older adults.18)
Nevertheless, physical inactivity remains a significant public health concern among older adults, particularly those aged ≥75 years.19-21) Numerous studies have reported that most older adults fail to achieve the recommended physical activity levels, with average daily step counts falling below health-promoting thresholds.22,23) Physical limitations, low self-efficacy, fear of falling, social isolation,24,25) and environmental barriers26) are obstacles to physical activity in this population. These factors hinder the initiation of exercise and maintenance of regular physical activity.
Therefore, municipality-based exercise interventions,27) including community-level walking promotion programs targeting older adults have been launched to prevent functional decline and extend healthy life expectancy. If municipality-led exercise programs improve residents’ health, they could represent an important public health strategy for promoting physical activity and preventing chronic diseases at the community level. However, few studies have examined the effectiveness of short-term, municipality-led exercise programs targeting older adults; especially the assessment of changes in daily step counts or behavioral changes, highlighting a gap between evidence and the implementation of public health initiatives at the municipal level.28) The transtheoretical model (TTM) is widely recognized as a valid framework for assessing behavioral changes. According to this model, progression through behavioral stages—from pre-contemplation and contemplation to preparation, action, and maintenance—is associated with the adoption and sustenance of health-promoting behaviors.29,30) However, only a few studies have assessed the effectiveness of municipality-led interventions using TTM-based outcome measures.
We aimed to assess changes in behavioral stages associated with participation in a municipality-led walking program.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study Design

We conducted a retrospective observational study using data from a community-based physical activity program, “Tec-Tec Zushi”,31) and the National Health Insurance (NHI) claims database (Kokuho Database [KDB]). The Tec-Tec Zushi program was implemented from August to December 2021, whereas the health insurance claims data were analyzed from April 2017 to March 2023.
As the program was designed to encourage the development of exercise habits among older adults, a control group was not established within the initial program framework. Therefore, to enable a comparative analysis, a comparison group comprising older adults residing in the same municipality during the same period as the intervention was retrospectively constructed using data from the KDB.

Participants and Data Sources

The intervention group consisted of older adults who voluntarily enrolled in the Tec-Tec Zushi physical activity program, were not advised by a physician to restrict their physical activity, and provided written informed consent for secondary use of their data. The pre-program questionnaire and pedometer32) were administered during a pre-implementation orientation session organized by the municipality. The post-program questionnaire was administered when participants visited the city office to report program completion and return their pedometers.
The control group comprised NHI enrollees aged ≥65 years who resided in Zushi City during the program implementation period in 2021, underwent health check-up before and after the intervention period, and had available check-up data. Individuals were excluded if they moved out of Zushi City, relocated to the city during the study period, died during the study period, or had missing data on key variables.
Two primary data sources were used: the program records, which included participant identification documents (IDs), step count logs, and responses to behavioral questionnaires administered before and after the program,33,34) and the NHI claims database (KDB), which included demographic information and health checkup results, such as body mass index (BMI) and self-reported physical activity. For analysis, 2021 was used as a reference point; the most recent health checkup data obtained between April 2017 and March 2021 were used as pre-intervention data, and those obtained between April 2022 and March 2023 were used as post-intervention data.
These datasets were linked using unique identifiers by a certified third-party agency, and all data were anonymized prior to the analysis.

Outcome

The primary outcome was the change in behavioral stage.35-37) The TTM describes how individuals progress toward adopting healthier behaviors in five stages. The concept of “stage of change” provides a useful framework for evaluating an individual’s readiness to initiate exercise and maintain physical activity.36) Participants’ behavioral stages related to lifestyle improvement were assessed using a five-point scale: (1) no intention to act (pre-contemplation), (2) intention to act (contemplation), (3) preparation, (4) action, and (5) maintenance for more than 1 year. The behavioral stage was measured before and after the interventions. Stages 4 and 5 correspond to the “action” and “maintenance” stages, respectively, and are interpreted as indicating regular engagement in physical activity.

Covariates

The covariates included age (year), sex, height (cm), weight (kg), BMI (kg/m2), the presence or absence of a habitual exercise routine lasting at least 30 minutes, and the pre-intervention TTM stage. For the intervention group, height and weight were measured using a bioelectrical impedance analyzer and recorded by municipal staff, whereas for the control group, these values were obtained from health checkup records.
Information on habitual exercise and the pre-intervention TTM stage was obtained from self-administered questionnaires. These variables encompassed all available data obtained by linking records from the physical activity program with health checkup information from the NHI database.

Statistical Analysis

Continuous variables are expressed as medians and ranges, and categorical variables as counts and percentages. Ordinal logistic regression was applied to assess the association between program participation and the five-level TTM stage. Three models were constructed: an unadjusted model, a model adjusted for basic demographic characteristics, and a fully adjusted model that controlled for pre-intervention TTM stage and pre-intervention habitual exercise.
The TTM scale was then dichotomized into lower (Stages 1–3) and higher (Stages 4–5) stages, and binary logistic regression analyses were conducted using the same three models. Results are reported as odds ratios (ORs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs). All statistical analyses were performed using R (version 4.3.3; R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria), and statistical significance was defined as a two-sided p-value <0.05.

Ethical Considerations

At the time of recruitment, municipal staff provided verbal and written explanations to prospective participants regarding the purpose of the study, the scope of data use, the voluntary nature of participation, and the right to decline participation. Only those who provided written informed consent were included in the analysis, and their program participation data were solely used for research purposes.
Data related to the physical activity program were provided to the research team through a third-party data processor, the Japan Medical Information Management Organization. All personally identifiable information, such as names and addresses, was removed prior to data transfer. The data were fully anonymized, and individual participants were not identifiable at any stage of the analysis.
In the NHI database, anonymized health checkup data were provided by a third-party organization. Although all personally identifiable information was removed, each dataset was linked using an anonymized ID, allowing researchers to distinguish between program participants and non-participants. Accordingly, the program participation status was identifiable, but the individual identities remained confidential. Data handling and storage complied fully with Japanese laws and regulations. This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the University of Electro-Communications (Approval No. 220119).

RESULTS

Participant Characteristics

Among the 18,101 residents aged ≥65 years living in Zushi City in 2021, 150 individuals (0.8%) voluntarily participated in the municipality-led walking promotion program (Fig. 1).
In the intervention group, 20 participants (13%) were excluded from the analysis due to missing questionnaire responses or program dropout, leaving 130 participants (87%). For the non-intervention group, we extracted data of 1,292 residents who had received health checkups during the pre- and post-intervention periods from the NHI database. In total, 1,422 individuals were included in the pre-intervention analytic dataset. Table 1 presents the baseline characteristics.
At the pre-intervention time point (January 2021), the mean age was 69.8 years in the non-intervention group and 78.0 years in the intervention group. The non-intervention group included 527 men (41%) and the intervention group included 40 men (31%). Regarding exercise habits, 673 individuals (52%) in the non-intervention group and 77 individuals (59%) in the intervention group reported engaging in at least 30 minutes of regular exercise (Table 1).

Associations between Event Participation and Readiness for Lifestyle Improvement

Regarding the ordinal logistic regression analyses, participants had higher odds of being at a higher stage of readiness than non-participants (OR=2.91, 95% CI 2.08–4.07) in the unadjusted model (Model 1). This association remained in Model 2 after adjusting for age, sex, and BMI (OR=2.99, 95% CI 1.96–4.58). In Model 3, event participants continued to show higher odds of being in a higher readiness stage (OR=2.98, 95% CI 1.94–4.60) (Table 2).
To further examine the association between program participation and progression toward higher behavioral readiness for lifestyle improvement, we conducted logistic regression analyses using a dichotomized TTM variable, classifying Stages 1–3 (pre-contemplation, contemplation, preparation) and Stages 4–5 (action, maintenance). In the unadjusted model, participants had significantly higher odds of being classified in Stages 4–5 compared with non-participants (OR=2.53, 95% CI 1.75–3.66). This association remained significant in the model adjusted for basic demographic characteristics and in the fully adjusted model, suggesting that program participation was consistently associated with higher odds of being in the action or maintenance stages. Taken together, these analytical results indicate that the direction of the estimates was consistent across all models, suggesting that participation in the program may be associated with higher behavioral readiness for lifestyle improvement.

DISCUSSION

Summary of Findings and Interpretation of Effectiveness

Program participation was consistently associated with higher odds of being in a more advanced behavioral stage across all models. Although the magnitude of the association was modest, the direction and consistency of the findings suggest a potential beneficial influence of participation on behavioral readiness.
The participants in the intervention group were older on average than the comparison group. Since advanced age is generally associated with physical limitations and greater difficulty in adopting new behaviors,38) this age imbalance is likely to bias the estimated effect toward the null rather than inflate it. Thus, the fact that an association was observed even under these conditions suggests that program participation may have supported progression in the behavioral stage among community-dwelling older adults. It also indicates that the program may have been feasible and sustainable even for adults in the later stages of old age.
Additionally, the intervention group included a higher proportion of women, consistent with commonly observed trends in voluntary participation in community-based programs.39) The control group was composed of a greater proportion of men, resulting in a sex imbalance between the two groups. Although these demographic differences may affect comparability, the consistently higher odds of being in more advanced behavioral stages among program participants support the potential value of this community-based intervention.

Mechanisms of Behavioral Change Promoted by Short-Term, Municipality-led Interventions

Participants in the intervention group were more likely to be at higher stages of the TTM at baseline than participants in the control group, likely reflecting the characteristics of individuals who voluntarily enroll in community programs.40) However, after accounting for these initial differences, the ordinal logistic regression analyses consistently demonstrated that program participation was associated with higher odds of being in more advanced behavioral stages. Although the magnitude of these associations was modest, the consistent direction of the estimates suggests that participation may contribute to improvements in behavioral readiness for lifestyle change.
In contrast, many individuals in the control group remained in the contemplation stage (Stage 2) throughout the observation period, recognizing the need for behavioral change but not progressing toward concrete action. This stagnation aligns with previous findings that age-related declines in motivation and physical capacity can impede the transition from intention to action.38) Moreover, behavioral change is unlikely to occur without targeted support.41) Prolonged inactivity contributes to cognitive decline and deterioration in activities of daily living (ADL) among older adults. In Japan, many older people experienced substantial reductions in daily activity due to prolonged stay-at-home recommendations during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic.42) Previous studies reported elevated levels of anxiety among residents during the COVID-19 pandemic.43) This may have significantly increased older adults’ tendency to stay indoors, potentially leading to reduced physical activity. The timing of this program coincided with these social circumstances, which may further explain the observed stagnation in behavioral readiness in the control group. Although the distributional shift in TTM stages appeared modest, the ordinal logistic regression showed higher odds of being in advanced TTM stages among program participants. These findings suggest that even short-term, municipality-led interventions may support early behavioral shifts in older adults. This interpretation is consistent with evidence that even small increases in physical activity yield health benefits in sedentary older adults.5) Guidelines also emphasize that reducing sedentary time and incorporating activity of any intensity contributes to better health in later life.44)
Several key program components may have contributed to the observed behavioral shift: self-monitoring through step-count visualization, immediate feedback mechanisms, and social connectedness within the community. The ability to monitor one’s step count likely promotes self-awareness and self-regulation, which have been associated with enhanced self-efficacy in older adults. Previous intervention studies have reported that sending regular short message service reminders to older adults engaged in exercise programs improves attitudes toward physical activity and promotes participation.44) Similarly, feedback such as verbal encouragement from municipal staff and incentive-based rewards (e.g., coupons linked to step counts) may have served as positive reinforcement, thereby enhancing motivation for continued engagement.45) Additionally, shared participation among residents may have fostered a sense of social connectedness, mitigating feelings of isolation and promoting sustained adherence to the program. Given that limited access to exercise facilities and social isolation are well-documented barriers to physical activity in this population, the program’s accessible, community-based approach may have helped overcome these obstacles.24,25) These elements likely worked synergistically to support participants’ progression from contemplation and preparation to action, underscoring the potential of short-term, low-cost interventions to stimulate early behavioral changes among older adults.

Policy Relevance and Practical Applicability

The findings of this study indicate that short-term, low-cost, municipality-led interventions can effectively promote early-stage behavioral changes among older adults, providing valuable insights for community health promotion and long-term care prevention strategies. Previous research on physical activity has predominantly focused on long-term outcomes such as mortality, fractures, and long-term care certification.46) However, this study focuses on behavioral change as an intermediate outcome that precedes these endpoints. This study elucidates the mechanisms through which physical activity yields health benefits and highlights the importance of promoting lifestyle modifications before clinical deterioration occurs.
These findings suggest the importance of municipality-led exercise programs on public health. Prior studies show that behavioral change functions as an important pathway linking community interventions with reduced health complications.29,47) Sustained increases in physical activity can reduce the risk of chronic diseases, functional decline, and the need for long-term care.6,48) Therefore, demonstrating that municipality-led programs can promote health-related behavioral change suggests that these initiatives may effectively improve population health at the community level.
Additionally, although participants in this study tended to be at a relatively advanced stage in their readiness to change their behavior, the results remained similar after adjusting for baseline behavioral stage. This suggests that the intervention could benefit individuals with lower readiness for behavioral change. If participation among individuals with lower levels of interest in physical activity could be increased, the potential population-level health impact might be even greater.30) Individuals with higher behavioral readiness may be able to maintain physical activity independently, whereas those with lower readiness may be less responsive to such programs; therefore, stage-tailored motivational approaches and intervention designs may be necessary.49) These results imply that encouraging participation among residents in earlier stages of behavioral readiness through alternative outreach or engagement strategies could enable a more inclusive, population-based approach and enhance the effectiveness of municipality-led health promotion programs.
This study contributes to the relatively limited body of literature that rigorously evaluates the effectiveness of municipality-led health initiatives. Although community-level interventions have proliferated in recent years, systematic reviews have noted a scarcity of peer-reviewed evaluations of such programs. This study attempted to evaluate a community-implemented, non-structured program in a comparable manner by linking administrative program data with health checkup records.50) The methodological approach employed in this study can serve as a practical tool for other municipalities seeking to evaluate the effectiveness of their health interventions.
The program centered on walking demonstrated potential health benefits. Accumulating evidence suggests that increased step counts are associated with a reduced risk of lifestyle-related diseases, fractures, and long-term care dependency, even in the absence of complex or high-intensity exercise regimens. This supports the feasibility and long-term sustainability of walking-based interventions for promoting healthy aging.
The program encouraged self-management among participants by minimizing their reliance on professional instructors and structured sessions. This characteristic enhances both the scalability and sustainability of the intervention, making it feasible within the resource constraints commonly faced by municipal governments. The combination of potential cost-effectiveness and promotion of autonomous health-behavior change underscores the practical utility of community-based walking programs and supports further evaluation within broader policy and research frameworks.

Limitations

This study has some limitations. Although data were obtained from the NHI database and program records, only a small set of standardized variables—age, sex, BMI, and baseline exercise habits—could be included in the adjusted models. Important factors that should ideally be considered, such as ADL, general health status, and chronic conditions, were not available. Additionally, commonly examined socioeconomic variables—including household income, living arrangements, and educational background—could not be incorporated. These data limitations may have introduced residual confounding; therefore, the findings should be interpreted with caution. However, because they lived in the same area during the same period and regularly underwent health checkups at relatively frequent intervals, their living circumstances were likely broadly similar to those of the program participants.
The intervention group included a higher proportion of older-old adults and women, indicating potential baseline differences between groups that may have influenced the estimated effects. To improve comparability, future studies may consider examining more homogeneous populations, such as individuals with similar motivations for participating in exercise programs. However, because municipal programs are generally implemented for the broader older adult population, constructing a strictly comparable control group is inherently challenging. This issue has been highlighted in prior studies, and improving methods for identifying and constructing comparable populations remains an important direction for future research.
The primary outcome was based on self-administered questionnaires, which may have been influenced by respondents’ emotional states or the context in which the survey was completed. Social desirability bias may have led to overreporting of favorable behaviors. Additionally, the baseline survey was administered immediately after the program orientation, and the follow-up survey was completed when returning the pedometer in the intervention group—situations in which participants may have been more motivated. Contrarily, the control group completed surveys during routine health checkups, without exposure to a program context.
The intervention period was limited to 5 months, making it impossible to evaluate the long-term sustainability of behavioral changes. Although short-term improvements were observed, it remains unclear whether these changes persisted over time or led to downstream outcomes such as reduced fall incidence or lower rates of long-term care certification. Longitudinal studies are needed to determine the durability and broader health implications of these behavioral changes.
In this study, 13.3% of participants did not complete the questionnaire. Notably, 13 of these individuals did not respond at all, suggesting they may have declined to participate or have withdrawn during the intervention period. Previous studies of municipal programs have reported high dropout rates (22%–76%), yet factors influencing participation, adherence, and withdrawal remain insufficiently examined.50)
In conclusion, our findings provide a valuable foundation for the development of future long-term care prevention strategies and community health initiatives. Short-term, low-cost community-based interventions, such as this walking program, may be practical for encouraging lifestyle modification among older adults. However, future studies should incorporate a broader set of influential factors and a longer follow-up period to determine whether the observed behavioral changes are sustained.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

The authors extend their sincere gratitude to the staff of the Zushi City Office for their cooperation in the data provision and program documentation. We also thank the participants of the walking program, whose involvement made this study possible.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The researchers claim no conflicts of interest.

FUNDING

This study was partially supported by the Japan Society for the Promotion of Science (JSPS) KAKENHI Grant-in-Aid for Early-Career Scientists (Research Activity Start-up), awarded to Takeshi Miura (Grant No. 24K23720). No additional funding was received from public, commercial, or non-profit sectors.

AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS

Conceptualization, SS; Writing-original draft, TM; Formal analysis, TM, KM; Writing-review & editing, KM, SS.

DATA AVAILABILITY STATEMENT

The datasets generated and analyzed during this study are not publicly available due to privacy agreements with the local government. However, data supporting the findings are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

Fig. 1.
Flow diagram of participant selection in the intervention and control groups.
agmr-25-0200f1.jpg
Table 1.
Baseline characteristics of the participants before and after the intervention
Variable Before the intervention (n=1,422) After the intervention (n=1,422)
Non-participants (n=1,292) Participants (n=130) Non-participants (n=1,292) Participants (n=130)
Age (y) 70 (68–72) 78 (73–82) 70 (68–72) 78 (73–82)
Height (cm) 159.3 (153.3–166.4) 156.0 (150.0–162.2) 159.0 (153.0–166.0) 155.0 (150.0–162.2)
Weight (kg) 57.0 (50.0–66.0) 55.0 (50.0–62.3) 56.5 (49.4–65.6) 55.0 (50.0–62.0)
BMI (kg/m2) 22.6 (20.5–24.6) 22.5 (20.9–24.3) 22.4 (20.3–24.6) 22.6 (20.8–24.6)
Sex
 Male 527 (40.8) 40 (30.8) 527 (40.8) 40 (30.8)
 Female 765 (59.2) 90 (69.2) 765 (59.2) 90 (69.2)
Habit of physical activity ≥ 30 min/day
 Yes 673 (52.1) 77 (59.2) 598 (46.2) 69 (53.0)
 No 619 (47.9) 53 (40.8) 694 (53.7) 61 (47.0)
Health behavior improvement intention (TTM stage)
 Stage 1. Precontemplation 368 (28.5) 23 (17.7) 412 (31.9) 10 (7.7)
 Stage 2. Contemplation 327 (25.3) 9 (6.9) 297 (23.0) 11 (8.5)
 Stage 3. Preparation 158 (12.2) 31 (23.8) 131 (10.1) 34 (26.1)
 Stage 4. Action 122 (9.4) 12 (9.2) 126 (9.8) 22 (16.9)
 Stage 5. Maintenance 317 (24.5) 55 (42.3) 326 (25.2) 53 (40.8)

Values are presented as median (interquartile range) or number (%).

BMI, body mass index; TTM, transtheoretical model.

Table 2.
Odds ratios from three ordinal logistic regression models for readiness for lifestyle improvement
Variable Model 1 Model 2 Model 3
OR (95% CI) p-value OR (95% CI) p-value OR (95% CI) p-value
Event (participant vs. non-participant) 2.91 (2.08–4.07) <0.0001 2.99 (1.96–4.58) <0.0001 2.98 (1.94–4.60) <0.0001
Age (per 1-year increase) 1.0035 (0.973–1.035) 0.826 1.0044 (0.974–1.036) 0.781
Sex (female vs. male) 1.027 (0.843–1.251) 0.792 1.011 (0.829–1.234) 0.911
BMI (per 1-unit increase) (baseline) 1.0096 (0.981–1.039) 0.521 1.0117 (0.982–1.042) 0.441
Regular exercise (≥30 min/day) (baseline) 1.0076 (0.825–1.231) 0.941
TTM Stage 2 vs. 1 (baseline) 0.81 (0.62–1.05) 0.113
TTM Stage 3 vs. 2 (baseline) 0.96 (0.70–1.32) 0.799
TTM Stage 4 vs. 3 (baseline) 0.73 (0.51–1.03) 0.071
TTM Stage 5 vs. 4 (baseline) 0.71 (0.55–0.92) 0.010

BMI, body mass index; TTM, transtheoretical model; OR, odds ratio; CI, confidence interval.

Model 1 is an unadjusted ordinal logistic regression model. Model 2 is adjusted for age, sex, and BMI. Model 3 is a fully adjusted model that additionally includes baseline TTM stage and regular physical activity lasting at least 30 minutes per day. Higher odds ratios represent greater odds of being in a higher stage of readiness for lifestyle improvement.

REFERENCES

1. World Health Organization. Ageing and health [Internet]. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2024 [cited 2025 Jul 1]. Available from: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/ageing-and-health.

2. Cabinet Office, Government of Japan. Annual report on the ageing society [Internet]. Tokyo, Japan: Cabinet Office; 2024 [cited 2025 Jul 1]. Available from: https://www8.cao.go.jp/kourei/whitepaper/index-w.html.

3. Alkhodary AA, Aljunid SM, Ismail A, Nur AM, Shahar S. The economic burden of frailty among elderly people: a review of the current literature. MJPHM 2020;20:224-32.
crossref pdf
4. World Health Organization. Decade of healthy ageing [Internet]. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2020 [cited 2025 Jul 1]. Available from: https://www.who.int/initiatives/decade-of-healthy-ageing.

5. World Health Organization. WHO guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour [Internet]. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2020 [cited 2025 Jul 1]. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240015128.

6. McPhee JS, French DP, Jackson D, Nazroo J, Pendleton N, Degens H. Physical activity in older age: perspectives for healthy ageing and frailty. Biogerontology 2016;17:567-80.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
7. Bull FC, Al-Ansari SS, Biddle S, Borodulin K, Buman MP, Cardon G, et al. World Health Organization 2020 guidelines on physical activity and sedentary behaviour. Br J Sports Med 2020;54:1451-62.
crossref pmid pmc
8. Ungvari Z, Fazekas-Pongor V, Csiszar A, Kunutsor SK. The multifaceted benefits of walking for healthy aging: from Blue Zones to molecular mechanisms. Geroscience 2023;45:3211-39.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
9. Hanson S, Jones A. Is there evidence that walking groups have health benefits?: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Sports Med 2015;49:710-5.
crossref pmid pmc
10. Bravata DM, Smith-Spangler C, Sundaram V, Gienger AL, Lin N, Lewis R, et al. Using pedometers to increase physical activity and improve health: a systematic review. JAMA 2007;298:2296-304.
crossref pmid
11. Bizzozero-Peroni B, Diaz-Goni V, Jimenez-Lopez E, Rodriguez-Gutierrez E, Sequi-Dominguez I, Nunez de Arenas-Arroyo S, et al. Daily step count and depression in adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA Netw Open 2024;7:e2451208.
crossref pmid pmc
12. Stens NA, Bakker EA, Manas A, Buffart LM, Ortega FB, Lee DC, et al. Relationship of daily step counts to all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events. J Am Coll Cardiol 2023;82:1483-94.
crossref pmid
13. Banach M, Lewek J, Surma S, Penson PE, Sahebkar A, Martin SS, et al. The association between daily step count and all-cause and cardiovascular mortality: a meta-analysis. Eur J Prev Cardiol 2023;30:1975-85.
crossref pmid
14. Hall KS, Hyde ET, Bassett DR, Carlson SA, Carnethon MR, Ekelund U, et al. Systematic review of the prospective association of daily step counts with risk of mortality, cardiovascular disease, and dysglycemia. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2020;17:78.
crossref pmc pdf
15. Paluch AE, Bajpai S, Bassett DR, Carnethon MR, Ekelund U, Evenson KR, et al. Daily steps and all-cause mortality: a meta-analysis of 15 international cohorts. Lancet Public Health 2022;7:e219-28.
crossref pmid
16. Inoue K, Tsugawa Y, Mayeda ER, Ritz B. Association of daily step patterns with mortality in US adults. JAMA Netw Open 2023;6:e235174.
crossref pmid pmc
17. Okamoto S, Kamimura K, Shiraishi K, Sumita K, Komamura K, Tsukao A, et al. Daily steps and healthcare costs in Japanese communities. Sci Rep 2021;11:15095.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
18. Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare. Exercise guide for health promotion [Internet]. Tokyo, Japan: Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare; 2023 [cited 2025 Jul 1]. Available from: https://kennet.mhlw.go.jp/information/information/exercise/s-00-001.

19. Ding D, Lawson KD, Kolbe-Alexander TL, Finkelstein EA, Katzmarzyk PT, van Mechelen W, et al. The economic burden of physical inactivity: a global analysis of major non-communicable diseases. Lancet 2016;388:1311-24.
crossref pmid
20. Duijvestijn M, de Wit GA, van Gils PF, Wendel-Vos GC. Impact of physical activity on healthcare costs: a systematic review. BMC Health Serv Res 2023;23:572.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
21. Cunningham C, O'Sullivan R, Caserotti P, Tully MA. Consequences of physical inactivity in older adults: a systematic review of reviews and meta-analyses. Scand J Med Sci Sports 2020;30:816-27.
crossref pmid pdf
22. Ekelund U, Steene-Johannessen J, Brown WJ, Fagerland MW, Owen N, Powell KE, et al. Does physical activity attenuate, or even eliminate, the detrimental association of sitting time with mortality?: a harmonised meta-analysis of data from more than 1 million men and women. Lancet 2016;388:1302-10.
crossref pmid
23. Althoff T, Sosic R, Hicks JL, King AC, Delp SL, Leskovec J. Large-scale physical activity data reveal worldwide activity inequality. Nature 2017;547:336-9.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
24. Franco MR, Tong A, Howard K, Sherrington C, Ferreira PH, Pinto RZ, et al. Older people's perspectives on participation in physical activity: a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative literature. Br J Sports Med 2015;49:1268-76.
crossref pmid
25. Delerue Matos A, Barbosa F, Cunha C, Voss G, Correia F. Social isolation, physical inactivity and inadequate diet among European middle-aged and older adults. BMC Public Health 2021;21:924.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
26. Sallis JF, Cerin E, Conway TL, Adams MA, Frank LD, Pratt M, et al. Physical activity in relation to urban environments in 14 cities worldwide: a cross-sectional study. Lancet 2016;387:2207-17.
crossref pmid pmc
27. Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology. The third basic plan for the promotion of sports [Internet]. Tokyo, Japan: Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science, and Technology; 2022 [cited 2025 Jul 1]. Available from: https://www.mext.go.jp/sports/en/b_menu/policy/sysbudget/thirdsportbp.html.

28. Pinheiro MB, Oliveira JS, Baldwin JN, Hassett L, Costa N, Gilchrist H, et al. Impact of physical activity programs and services for older adults: a rapid review. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act 2022;19:87.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
29. Jimenez-Zazo F, Romero-Blanco C, Castro-Lemus N, Dorado-Suarez A, Aznar S. Transtheoretical model for physical activity in older adults: systematic review. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2020;17:9262.
crossref pmid pmc
30. Hashemzadeh M, Rahimi A, Zare-Farashbandi F, Alavi-Naeini AM, Daei A. Transtheoretical model of health behavioral change: a systematic review. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res 2019;24:83-90.
crossref pmid pmc
31. Zushi City. Official website [Internet]. Zushi City, Kanagawa Prefecture; 2025 [cited 2025 Jul 1]. Available from: https://www.city.zushi.kanagawa.jp/.

32. Tanita. Activity monitor AM-150 [Internet]. Tokyo, Japan: Tanita Corporation; c2025 [cited 2025 Jul 1]. Available from: https://www.tanita.co.jp/product/activitymonitor-pedmeter/3281/.

33. Kondo K. Progress in aging epidemiology in Japan: the JAGES project. J Epidemiol 2016;26:331-6.
crossref pmid pmc
34. Japan Agency for Gerontological Evaluation Study official website [Internet]. Kashiwa, Japan: Japan Agency for Gerontological Evaluation Study; c2022 [cited 2025 Jul 1]. Available from: https://www.jages.net/?_layoutmode=off&lang=english.

35. Marcus BH, Simkin LR. The transtheoretical model: applications to exercise behavior. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1994;26:1400-4.
crossref pmid
36. Oba T, Takano K, Katahira K, Kimura K. Revisiting the transtheoretical model for physical activity: a large-scale cross-sectional study on Japanese-speaking adults. Ann Behav Med 2024;58:167-78.
crossref pmid pdf
37. Anderson G, Horvath J, Knickman JR, Colby DC, Schear S, Jung M. Chronic conditions: making the case for ongoing care. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University; 2002.

38. Meredith SJ, Cox NJ, Ibrahim K, Higson J, McNiff J, Mitchell S, et al. Factors that influence older adults' participation in physical activity: a systematic review of qualitative studies. Age Ageing 2023;52:afad145.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
39. Hirose T, Sawaya Y, Ishizaka M, Hashimoto N, Urano T. Association between frailty, locomotive syndrome, and participation frequency in a long-term care prevention program among community-dwelling Japanese older adults: a sex-specific analysis. Ann Geriatr Med Res 2025;29:384-92.
crossref pmid pmc pdf
40. Kim G, Jeong Y, Hwang Y, Park KH. Analysis of the types of social activity participation of older adults living in the community and the health level and quality of life by types: applying latent class analysis. Alzheimers Dement 2024;20:e094765.
crossref
41. van Stralen MM, De Vries H, Mudde AN, Bolman C, Lechner L. Determinants of initiation and maintenance of physical activity among older adults: a literature review. Health Psychol Rev 2009;3:147-207.
crossref
42. Tison GH, Avram R, Kuhar P, Abreau S, Marcus GM, Pletcher MJ, et al. Worldwide effect of COVID-19 on physical activity: a descriptive study. Ann Intern Med 2020;173:767-70.
crossref pmid pmc
43. Sasaki R, Ota A, Yatsuya H, Tabuchi T. Gender difference in fear and anxiety about and perceived susceptibility to COVID-19 in the third wave of pandemic among the Japanese general population: a nationwide web-based cross-sectional survey. Int J Environ Res Public Health 2022;19:16239.
crossref pmid pmc
44. Ekelund U, Tarp J, Steene-Johannessen J, Hansen BH, Jefferis B, Fagerland MW, et al. Dose-response associations between accelerometry measured physical activity and sedentary time and all cause mortality: systematic review and harmonised meta-analysis. BMJ 2019;366:l4570.
crossref pmid pmc
45. Bentlage E, Nyamadi JJ, Dubbeldam R. The importance of activating factors in physical activity interventions for older adults using information and communication technologies: systematic review. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 2023;11:e42968.
crossref pmid pmc
46. Watts EL, Matthews CE, Freeman JR, Gorzelitz JS, Hong HG, Liao LM, et al. Association of leisure time physical activity types and risks of all-cause, cardiovascular, and cancer mortality among older adults. JAMA Netw Open 2022;5:e2228510.
crossref pmid pmc
47. El Kirat H, van Belle S, Khattabi A, Belrhiti Z. Behavioral change interventions, theories, and techniques to reduce physical inactivity and sedentary behavior in the general population: a scoping review. BMC Public Health 2024;24:2099.
crossref pmid pmc
48. Morikawa M, Harada K, Kurita S, Nishijima C, Fujii K, Kakita D, et al. Estimating the risk reduction in disability incidence by adhering to recommendation-based physical activity in older adults: a cohort study. J Epidemiol Community Health 2025;79:796-802.
crossref pmid pmc
49. McMahon SK, Lewis BA, Guan W, Wang Q, Hayes SM, Wyman JF, et al. Effect of intrapersonal and interpersonal behavior change strategies on physical activity among older adults: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Netw Open 2024;7:e240298.
crossref pmid pmc
50. Valdes-Badilla PA, Gutierrez-Garcia C, Perez-Gutierrez M, Vargas-Vitoria R, Lopez-Fuenzalida A. Effects of physical activity governmental programs on health status in independent older adults: a systematic review. J Aging Phys Act 2019;27:265-75.
crossref pmid


ABOUT
ARTICLE & TOPICS
Article Category

Browse all articles >

TOPICS

Browse all articles >

BROWSE ARTICLES
EDITORIAL POLICY
FOR CONTRIBUTORS
Editorial Office
#401 Yuksam Hyundai Venturetel, 20, Teheran-ro 25-gil, Gangnam-gu, Seoul 06132, Korea
Tel: +82-2-2269-1039    Fax: +82-2-2269-1040    E-mail: agmr.editorial@gmail.com                

Copyright © 2026 by Korean Geriatrics Society.

Developed in M2PI

Close layer
prev next